ellis hutch
Metaphor and science

What I’m working on getting my head around today:

“Our ordinary metaphor that time is a spatial-like dimension leads us to ask, “But what happened before the Big Bang?” If all events can occur in time, then presumably so could the event of the Big Bang. It is a question that makes sense given our metaphor. The idea that time itself started with the Big Bang makes no sense given our common metaphor. The Big Bang would then not be occurring in time, but rather defining the start of time.

Einstein’s theory of general relativity uses a version of the metaphor that turns time into a landscape, that is, in which time is conceptualized as a space-like dimension…

…One can see general relativity as metaphorical. This does not make general relativity either false or fanciful or subjective, since its metaphors can still be apt. That is, they can entail non-metaphorical predictions that can be verified for falsified. In general, to say that a science is metaphorical is not to belittle it. Because metaphors preserve inferences, and because those inferences can have nonmetaphorical consequences, one can often test whether or not a scientific metaphor is apt. Indeed metaphor is what allows mathematical models to be linked to phenomena in the world and to be regarded as scientific theories.”

Lakoff and Johnson, Philosophy in the Flesh: the embodied mind and its challenge to western thought,Basic Books, New York 1999

Another visit to the tracking station at Tidbinbilla

Sulfurous smoke through the trees at Rotorua, NZ

[Flash 10 is required to watch video]

Another Antenna at Tidbinbilla DSS 45

Deep space

Largest antenna dish in the southern hemisphere

Deep Space Station 43 - Tidbinbilla

Embodied philosophy, time and distance

I’ve been reading a book on embodied philosophy recently and grappling with engaging with philosophical ideas through the lens/es of the cognitive sciences. I haven’t studied philosophy or science in any formal way so I’ve got a lot of ground to cover. My reading process involves lots of stopping and starting - copying out slabs of text in my note book and filling the pages I’m stumbling across with different coloured post-it notes.

Flicking back through the pages I find seemingly significant and sometimes mysterious notes:

telescopes etc.

neuro v phenomenological

basic theory all thought + language

Thomas Aquinas - projecting images - memory theatre

field - atmosphere - abstract

Today I’ve been reading about time.

In their book Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought, George Lakoff and Mark Johnson comment that

“It is virtually impossible for us to conceptualise time without metaphor.”

The text discusses that problem of the impossibility of conceiving of time ‘in itself’. When we think of or discuss time we use a range of metaphors - several linked to notions of associating time with distance and motion.

For some reason this idea reminded me of a series of quotes from Antarctic explorers’ diaries about the distances they travelled when surveying Antarctica - there’s something about that sense of duration coupled with vastness of space, exposure to an inhospitable environment and the physical reality of walking, walking, walking that is playing around the edges of my thoughts. I’ve got no idea where I’m going with these thoughts but I’m jotting them down now to revisit later.

In a transcript of Douglas Mawson’s diaries of the British Antarctic Expedition of 1907 - 1909 I encounter some quotes from Edgeworth David:

the total distance travelled from Cape Royds to the Magnetic Pole and back to our depot on the Drygalski Glacier was about 1260 miles

we were absent on our sledge journey for one hundred and twenty-two days… We had no supporting party, and … we pulled the sledges for the whole distance without assistance except, on rare occassions, from the wind.

On the high plateau was the difficulty of respiration, biting winds with low temperatures, difficult sledging…the cracking of our lips, fingers and feet, exhaustion from insufficient rations, disappointment at finding that the Magnetic Pole had shifted further inland than the position previously assigned to it.

Theres something in the elusiveness of the pole, in the slow journey, in the cracking bodies and the potential for the ground to open beneath their feet that makes this story compelling, that engages me in the same imaginative space every time I read it - even when I read it again and again.

How does this connect with my work - how do these stories connect with what I’m making in the studio - how do I find a way to articulate these tenuous connections that shy away from words and when I write about them - appear on the page so unsatisfactorily?

a gap, a space, an absence, a breath escaping through frosty lips, eyelids frozen shut, condensation on the mirror…

Image source: nla.pic-vn3124105 Mawson. Douglas, Sir, 1882-1958.

Stratified bubbly ice from the surface zone of Coast Lake, [Australasian Antarctic Expedition, 1911-1914] [picture].

Part of Mawson, Douglas, Sir, 1882-1958. Sir Douglas Mawson collection of Antarctic photographs [picture] [1908-1937]

Ice bergs and projectors

Thoughts drifting - sketch book

Reading and writing short stories

A couple of years ago I enrolled in an editing course. I was working full time in a job where I did heaps of proof reading and editing publicity and educational material. I thought the course might help brush up on my editing skills, I’d learn some of those cool mark-ups you see scribbled all over manuscripts and I could use my skills to do freelance work when I quit the public service.

To get the piece of paper I had to enroll in a couple of writing units as well as the editing ones.

I was a bit ambivalent about the writing part of the course. I hadn’t written a story since primary school. I’d written a masters thesis, various articles and had an inconsistent crack at blogging – but making up actual stories out of my imagination was daunting. I had used fictional strategies in my academic writing, I’d done live performance and I work with narrative in my visual art. For some reason though, writing a story scared me.

As a beginner fiction writer I was a very critical reader. I’ve been a keen reader all my life – I’ve always got a book on the go, often two or three. I read broadly: literature, fantasy, romance, detective fiction – anything – good writing, crappy writing and everything in between. How could I set aside all my opinions, likes, dislikes and just write? What would I write – what genre? How would I create convincing characters?

Being a visual artist, I tend to go for descriptive writing, I like to convey how things look and feel. But writing about people – inventing characters – writing from the perspective of an imaginary someone – where do you start?

In the classes we started in the conventional way – writing exercises, idea generation exercises – things I was familiar with teaching in a visual art context translated into the writing one. Being a student in these courses turned out to be fun – I could let go of all the stuff I’d read and indulge in writing nonsense, write in response to a song or a picture, write about the imaginary secret lives of my classmates. I can honestly say if I had not attended these courses I would not have started writing fiction. I also would perhaps not have rediscovered reading short stories.

My feelings about reading short stories were similar to those about writing fiction – ambivalent at best. Being a reader of novels, short stories were just too – well – short. I love becoming completely immersed in a book – reading for hours – all night – getting lost in the world of the story – short stories just don’t do that. Also, so many stories I read were boring – I would get to the end and think – why did I read that? I didn’t feel like they took me anywhere – they were fragments or beginnings, not entire things in their own right.

Being obliged to read short stories in the course I was studying, and also receiving a couple of anthologies as gifts, completely changed my opinions. I still find some short stories tedious and dull – but the same goes for art, music and film – some works just don’t appeal – for many and varied reasons – and some really are crap.

One of the great things about reading short stories is that they are not novels. I don’t have to commit days or weeks to them – I can read an entire story in one sitting before bed no matter how busy or tired I am. I don’t loose track of the story and have to start again because I’ve left it for too long. Short stories can pursue just one idea, they can be fragments, beginnings, moments. They can make you stop and think about something, they can turn my day upside down or give me a different perspective. They CAN take me on a journey, create new worlds and absorb me in their language, their colour, their rhythm.

Authors whose work I find inspiring include (in no particular order): David Foster-Wallace, Cate Kennedy, Neil Gaiman, Haruki Murakami, Italo Calvino, Jeanette Winterson, Franz Kafka, Hemingway, F Scott Fitzgerald, Roald Dahl, Robert Drewe, Isabelle Allende, Edgar Allen Poe, Tom Cho and many more.

I’ve started reading journals like the Griffith Review fiction editions, Going Down Swinging and various other compilations of contemporary writing to seek out writers I’m not familiar with.

The stories I’m drawn to vary widely. Writing with an absurd and surreal bent definitely appeals, but sometimes it is something very ordinary, simply rendered; an acute observation or a piece of writing that colours my day in a certain way. Sometimes it is the poetry of the writing itself, the way the story draws me into its world or the sounds and smells it evokes that stay with me long after I read it.

A few stories that have really stuck with me include:

David Foster Wallace – Incarnations of Burned Children – reading this for the first time gave me a stomach churning sensation of horror that stayed with me for days.

Ursula Le Guinn – Sur – a story of a group of female explorers who beat Amundsen to the South Pole

Cate Kennedy – Cold Snap

F Scott Fitzgerald – Diamond as big as the Ritz

Anthologies

Haruki Murakami – The Elephant Vanishes

Neil Gaiman – Fragile Things

Novellas

Charlotte Perkins Gillman – The Yellow Wallpaper

Patrick Suskind – The Pigeon

There are loads more, but these are the ones I can think of off the top of my head.